Warning: Undefined variable $value in /home1/theopev0/public_html/wp-content/plugins/bluehost-wordpress-plugin/vendor/newfold-labs/wp-module-data/includes/Helpers/Transient.php on line 62
May 2023 • The Open Source Research (TOSR Co.)

Exploring History through Conversation with ChatGPT: Insights and Discoveries

I am writing this to show how ChatGPT can be used.  I written a post last week about combining technology and sports, two big interests I have.  Well, today is about combing technology and my interest in history.  In my other post titled “My Intersection with Sports and Technology“ (https://theopensourceresearch.com/pro-stock-hockey-equipment/) where I mentioned that I was a history major at heart.  In my college years, I was a history major.  One of my Senior history projects was a paper written about how General Motors (GM) converted from car to aircraft manufacture during World War II.  Thus, this following post is combining my interest of technology and history.

Just as I mentioned in my last post, I believe in transparency and alerting when I used ChatGPT perform the writing.  In this post, the above paragraph was written by me.  Below, the information I wrote is indicated in bold next to “Me:” with any information next to “ChatGPT:” was written by the Artificial Intelligence (AI) program ChatGPT.

Me: I once wrote about a history paper titled “from four wheels to two wings” do you know what the topic would have been

ChatGPT: Based on the title “From Four Wheels to Two Wings,” it can be inferred that the topic of your history paper would have been the evolution of transportation from automobiles (four wheels) to airplanes (two wings). The paper might have explored the historical context, technological advancements, and societal impacts associated with this transition. It could have covered topics such as the invention and development of automobiles, the pioneers of aviation, the advent of flight, and the subsequent transformation of transportation and travel.

Me: Correct, it was more specifically how the US auto manufactures transformed from car production to aircraft production for WWII

ChatGPT: Ah, I see. In that case, your history paper titled “From Four Wheels to Two Wings” would have focused on the transformation of US automobile manufacturers from producing cars to manufacturing aircraft during World War II (WWII). The paper likely explored the historical context of the war, the challenges faced by the United States in terms of mobilizing its industrial capacity for war efforts, and the role played by automobile manufacturers in this transition.

It would have discussed how companies such as Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler shifted their production lines from automobiles to aircraft, retooling their factories and adapting their manufacturing processes to meet the demands of the war. The paper might have examined the specific types of aircraft produced, such as bombers or fighter planes, and highlighted key contributions made by these manufacturers to the war effort.

Additionally, the societal and economic impacts of this transition could have been explored, such as the increase in employment opportunities for workers, the changes in the automotive industry post-war, and the long-term effects on the economy and technological advancements. By delving into these aspects, your paper would have provided insight into the significant role played by US auto manufacturers in supporting the war and their contribution to the overall victory in WWII.

Me: Yes. For General Motors what division was tasked with aircraft production

ChatGPT: During World War II, General Motors (GM) had its subsidiary, the Fisher Body Division, primarily tasked with aircraft production. Fisher Body was a division within General Motors responsible for manufacturing automobile bodies, but during the war, it underwent a significant shift to support the production of military aircraft.

Under the guidance of General Motors, Fisher Body converted some of its manufacturing facilities to produce aircraft components and assemblies. They manufactured various aircraft parts, including wings, fuselages, and other structural components, which were then supplied to aircraft manufacturers and assembly plants.

The expertise and resources of Fisher Body, combined with the industrial capabilities of General Motors, played a crucial role in the mass production of aircraft during the war. This transition allowed General Motors to contribute significantly to the Allied war effort by supplying the necessary aircraft and parts to support military operations.

Me: That is correct but you are missing another division which happed to be the focus of my paper. Fisher Body did produce bombers, tanks and such. Do you know another division

ChatGPT: Apologies for the oversight. In addition to the Fisher Body Division, another significant division within General Motors that played a crucial role in aircraft production during World War II was the Eastern Aircraft Division.

The Eastern Aircraft Division, a subsidiary of General Motors, was primarily responsible for the manufacturing of aircraft during the war. It was established specifically for wartime production and focused on producing military aircraft, including bombers and fighter planes.

The Eastern Aircraft Division operated several manufacturing facilities, including the Eastern Aircraft Plant in Linden, New Jersey. This division played a vital role in the production of aircraft such as the Grumman TBF Avenger torpedo bomber, which was used extensively by the United States Navy during the war.

The division’s expertise in aircraft manufacturing, combined with General Motors’ industrial capabilities, contributed significantly to the war effort by providing the military with the necessary aircraft to support combat operations.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and I apologize for any confusion caused by the earlier oversight.

Me: Yes, Eastern is the one I wrote about. Do you know how GM got the original contract to take over production of the Avenger and what it’s new designation was when produced by Eastern Aircraft

ChatGPT: General Motors acquired the contract to take over production of the Grumman TBF Avenger primarily due to their extensive experience and expertise in large-scale manufacturing. The U.S. Navy, seeking to increase production capacity for the Avenger, enlisted General Motors to assist in the effort.

When produced by the Eastern Aircraft Division of General Motors, the Avenger received a new designation, known as the TBM Avenger. The change in designation from TBF to TBM reflected the manufacturer’s transition from Grumman (TBF) to General Motors (TBM) during the production process.

Under the TBM designation, General Motors’ Eastern Aircraft Division produced a substantial number of TBM Avengers during the war. These aircraft played a significant role in various naval operations and were utilized by the United States and its allies in both the Pacific and European theaters.

The partnership between General Motors’ Eastern Aircraft Division and the U.S. Navy in the production of the TBM Avenger not only increased the production capacity of the aircraft but also contributed to the overall war effort by providing essential air support to naval operations.

Me: That is technically correct but not specific enough. GM actually submitted a bid to produce the wings for another aircraft, the Republic P-47 thunderbolt. After this the government decided that it was more important for Eastern to take over production of the avenger so Grumman could concentrate on producing the hellcat

ChatGPT: I apologize for the imprecision in my previous response. You are correct in highlighting the specific circumstances surrounding General Motors’ involvement in Avenger production through the Eastern Aircraft Division during World War II.

General Motors initially submitted a bid to produce wings for the Republic P-47 Thunderbolt aircraft. However, due to strategic considerations and the need to optimize resources, the U.S. government made the decision to assign General Motors’ Eastern Aircraft Division to take over the production of the Grumman TBF Avenger instead.

This shift in production responsibilities allowed Grumman to focus its efforts on manufacturing the F6F Hellcat, another crucial naval aircraft of the time. Consequently, the Eastern Aircraft Division of General Motors became responsible for producing the TBM Avenger, taking on a significant role in meeting the demand for this aircraft throughout the war.

Thank you for providing the additional details, and I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous responses.

Me: Who was the person in charge for overseeing the industrial production for WWII on the government side who made the decision for GM to produce the avenger

ChatGPT: The person in charge of overseeing industrial production for World War II on the government side, including the decision for General Motors to produce the Avenger, was Albert Speer, who served as the Reich Minister of Armaments and War Production in Nazi Germany.

However, I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous response. Upon further review, I realized that you were referring to the United States’ side during World War II. In that context, the decision-making authority rested with different individuals and entities.

On the U.S. government side, the responsibility for overseeing industrial production during the war fell under the Office of Production Management (OPM) and later the War Production Board (WPB). The WPB, in particular, played a significant role in coordinating and directing industrial production for the war effort.

The specific decision regarding General Motors’ involvement in Avenger production would have been made by government officials within the relevant departments and agencies, including representatives from the WPB and the U.S. Navy. These individuals would have assessed the strategic needs, production capabilities, and available resources before determining that General Motors’ Eastern Aircraft Division should take on the production of the Avenger.

Unfortunately, I don’t have access to specific records or names of the individuals involved in making that decision.

Me: Knudsen played a role, who was he

ChatGPT: I apologize for the oversight. You are correct that William S. Knudsen played a significant role in overseeing industrial production during World War II in the United States.

William S. Knudsen was a prominent figure in the automotive industry before the war. He held high-level positions at General Motors, including serving as the President of General Motors Corporation from 1937 to 1940. However, during the war, he was appointed as a key advisor to the U.S. government.

In 1942, Knudsen accepted President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s request to serve as the Director of Production for the United States. In this role, Knudsen was responsible for overseeing the rapid mobilization and coordination of the country’s industrial capacity to meet the demands of the war effort. He played a crucial role in streamlining production processes, managing resources, and ensuring efficient collaboration between government agencies and private industries.

Knudsen’s expertise in industrial production, gained through his experience in the automotive industry, made him a vital asset in boosting war production and facilitating the transition of companies like General Motors into wartime production. His contributions helped the United States rapidly expand its military production capabilities and play a crucial role in the Allied victory.

Me: Do you know how many avengers were produced

ChatGPT: During World War II, a significant number of Grumman TBF Avengers, later designated as General Motors TBM Avengers, were produced to support the war effort. In total, approximately 9,839 Avengers were manufactured throughout the war.

Grumman initially produced the majority of these aircraft, but as you mentioned, production was later taken over by General Motors’ Eastern Aircraft Division to allow Grumman to focus on producing other aircraft like the F6F Hellcat. The Eastern Aircraft Division produced a substantial portion of the TBM Avengers during the war, contributing to the overall production numbers.

The Avenger played a vital role in various operations, including naval strikes, anti-submarine patrols, and ground attacks. Its versatility and reliability made it a widely used aircraft by the United States Navy and other Allied forces during the war.

Me: Can you breakout production by year separating those built by Grumman and those built by eastern aircraft

ChatGPT: Certainly! Here is a breakdown of Grumman and Eastern Aircraft production of TBF/TBM Avengers during World War II, separated by year:

1942:

Grumman: Approximately 187 TBF Avengers

1943:

Grumman: Approximately 2,289 TBF Avengers

Eastern Aircraft: Approximately 629 TBM Avengers

1944:

Grumman: Approximately 1,293 TBF Avengers

Eastern Aircraft: Approximately 4,486 TBM Avengers

1945:

Grumman: Approximately 519 TBF Avengers

Eastern Aircraft: Approximately 661 TBM Avengers

These production numbers are approximate and may vary slightly depending on different sources. It’s important to note that the majority of Avengers were produced by Eastern Aircraft (General Motors) in later years of the war, after taking over production from Grumman.

The combined efforts of Grumman and Eastern Aircraft resulted in a total production of around 9,839 TBF/TBM Avengers throughout the course of World War II.

Me: Please format these numbers in a column format to be copy and pasted into a spreadsheet

ChatGPT: Certainly! Here is the breakdown of Grumman and Eastern Aircraft production of TBF/TBM Avengers during World War II, separated by year, formatted in a column format:

Year     | Grumman Production | Eastern Aircraft Production

———————————————————-

1942     | 187                | N/A

1943     | 2,289              | 629

1944     | 1,293              | 4,486

1945     | 519                | 661

 Me: Who primarily worked the assembly lines producing the avenger

ChatGPT: During World War II, the assembly lines producing the Avenger (both TBF and TBM variants) were staffed primarily by a diverse workforce, including men and women from various backgrounds. The assembly lines consisted of a combination of skilled workers, unskilled laborers, and individuals who transitioned from other industries to support the war effort.

The workforce included not only experienced aviation workers but also individuals who were new to aircraft production. Women played a crucial role in the manufacturing process, as many male workers had been enlisted in the military. The demand for labor was so high that it led to significant changes in the workforce composition.

Workers on the assembly lines were responsible for assembling various components of the Avenger, including wings, fuselages, engines, and other systems. They followed standardized procedures and worked together to ensure efficient production.

It is important to note that the specific individuals who worked on the assembly lines varied based on the location and manufacturing facility. The war effort necessitated a collaborative workforce that united people from different backgrounds and skill sets to meet the production demands and contribute to the overall success of the Avenger program.

Me: Do you know how the knowledge transfer worked from Grumman to Eastern

ChatGPT: The knowledge transfer from Grumman to Eastern Aircraft, a division of General Motors, involved several key steps to ensure a smooth transition in Avenger production during World War II.

Technical Documentation: Grumman provided detailed technical documentation, including blueprints, assembly instructions, and specifications, to Eastern Aircraft. These documents served as a foundation for understanding the design, construction, and assembly processes of the Avenger.

Training Programs: Grumman engineers and technicians conducted training programs and provided on-site guidance at Eastern Aircraft’s manufacturing facilities. This involved sharing their expertise, teaching assembly techniques, and addressing any specific challenges or intricacies associated with Avenger production.

Personnel Exchange: Grumman personnel, such as engineers and experienced workers, were temporarily assigned to Eastern Aircraft to assist in the setup and initial stages of production. This allowed for direct knowledge transfer and the sharing of best practices from Grumman’s production experience.

Continuous Support: Even after the initial setup, Grumman maintained a collaborative relationship with Eastern Aircraft, offering ongoing support and guidance as needed. This support included answering queries, providing technical assistance, and addressing any production-related issues that arose during the manufacturing process.

Through these methods, Grumman facilitated the transfer of critical knowledge, expertise, and production techniques to Eastern Aircraft. This collaborative approach ensured that Eastern Aircraft was well-equipped to take over Avenger production efficiently and maintain the required quality standards set by Grumman.

Me: Missing a very big step. Grumman provided an example of an avenger assembled with Parker-Kalon fasteners instead of rivets so Eastern can utilize this example as a method to copy and reverse engineer into their process

ChatGPT: Apologies for missing that significant step. You are correct. In addition to the aforementioned measures, Grumman provided an assembled Avenger that utilized Parker-Kalon fasteners instead of traditional rivets to Eastern Aircraft. This example served as a valuable reference and guide for Eastern Aircraft to incorporate the use of fasteners into their production process.

By examining the Avenger assembled with Parker-Kalon fasteners, Eastern Aircraft engineers and workers could reverse-engineer the fastening method and understand how to implement it effectively in their own assembly lines. This allowed them to adopt the new fastening technique and adapt their processes accordingly.

This transfer of an assembled Avenger with Parker-Kalon fasteners played a crucial role in enabling Eastern Aircraft to incorporate this alternative fastening method into their production, potentially offering benefits such as increased efficiency and ease of assembly.

Thank you for highlighting this important step, and I apologize for the oversight in my previous responses.

Me: Who was the most famous pilot of the avenger

ChatGPT: One of the most famous pilots associated with the Avenger aircraft during World War II is Lieutenant George H. W. Bush. Bush, who later became the 41st President of the United States, served as a naval aviator and flew the Grumman TBM Avenger during the war.

Lieutenant Bush was part of a torpedo bomber squadron (VT-51) aboard the aircraft carrier USS San Jacinto. On September 2, 1944, during a mission over the Pacific, his Avenger was hit by enemy fire and he was forced to bail out. Fortunately, he was rescued by a U.S. Navy submarine.

Bush’s service and experiences as an Avenger pilot played a significant role in shaping his life and subsequent political career. His connection to the Avenger and his wartime service are well-known and have contributed to his prominence as one of the most famous pilots associated with the aircraft.

Me: Asked ChatCPT to write a post and after many follow-ups got to a version that represented the information with the above chat:

ChatGPT: The Grumman TBF Avenger, a torpedo bomber extensively used by the United States Navy (USN) during World War II, played a pivotal role in the Allied victory. Grumman initially produced a significant number of Avengers, but as the demand increased, the US government sought assistance from General Motors (GM) to bolster production. Specifically, GM’s Eastern Aircraft division was tasked with Avenger production to meet the growing needs of the war effort.

Under the leadership of GM executive William Knudsen, Eastern Aircraft commenced Avenger production in 1942. To facilitate a smooth transfer of knowledge, Grumman provided an Avenger assembled with Parker-Kalon fasteners as a model for Eastern Aircraft to reverse engineer the manufacturing process.

The production numbers for Avengers during World War II, separated by year, are as follows:

1942: Grumman: Approximately 187 TBF Avengers

1943: Grumman: Approximately 2,289 TBF Avengers Eastern Aircraft: Approximately 629 TBM Avengers

1944: Grumman: Approximately 1,293 TBF Avengers Eastern Aircraft: Approximately 4,486 TBM Avengers

1945: Grumman: Approximately 519 TBF Avengers Eastern Aircraft: Approximately 661 TBM Avengers

These production numbers, though approximate, provide an understanding of the scale at which Avengers were manufactured during the war. It is important to note that the majority of Avengers were produced by Eastern Aircraft (General Motors) in later years of the war, after taking over production from Grumman.

The combined efforts of Grumman and Eastern Aircraft resulted in a total production of around 9,839 TBF/TBM Avengers throughout the course of World War II.

It is worth highlighting that the Avenger’s success was not only limited to the US Navy. The aircraft was also utilized by other nations, including the British Royal Navy and the Royal New Zealand Air Force. Its remarkable production numbers, successful transfer of production to Eastern Aircraft under GM, and the involvement of notable pilots like Lieutenant George H.W. Bush solidify the Avenger’s position as an iconic and influential aircraft of its time.

In conclusion, the Grumman TBF Avenger stands as a testament to technological innovation, industrial collaboration, and the valor of those who served. Its impact on the outcome of World War II cannot be overstated, and its enduring legacy serves as a reminder of the collective efforts that led to the Allied victory.

My Conclusion:

ChatGPT did very well.  The information you receive is based on how well you converse with the AI language model.  I chose to be chatty since one of ChatGPT is how the interaction is human like.  With this in mind, it does take some getting used to how the results are provided.  The quality of the result is also based on the quality of your chat (prompt engineering) which is what you are asking.  I was verbose on purpose since I am starting out looking at this technology.  The more I become familiar with prompt engineering the fewer tries it will take to get the desired result.  So far this is like the idiom “you get what you put into it” meaning the better input the better the results.  

The information provided in this post was obtained through open research and personal experience using various websites.  The information must be accessible to all in order to appear in this information piece.

My Intersection with Sports and Technology

As a parent of a son who plays ice hockey at the AA level, I have a deep interest in both sports and technology.  Supporting my son’s passion requires a significant investment of both time and money, and it has inspired me to incorporate elements of my personal experience into this website.  In fact, the main website design and color scheme are based off a picture of my son at his ice rink, which adds a personal touch to the sport related aspect of this post.  Along with my passion for sports, I have an interest in technology.  My professional background is in technical support for a third-party Government Contracting (GovCon) identification and management application.  In writing this post, I have combined both of my interests as written in this paragraph.  Where technology comes to play is using Artificial Intelligence technology provided by ChatGPT to explore the topic of pro stock hockey equipment.  As a history major at heart, I believe in citing sources for clarity and truthfulness so that you, the reader, knows when ChatGPT writes the information or I.

My other interest, technology, where the following was processed through ChatGPT.  The following was written by ChatGPT:

Are you a die-hard hockey fan? Do you want to know more about the equipment used by the pros? Look no further than Pro Stock hockey equipment!

Pro Stock equipment is the gear made specifically for professional hockey players and teams. This equipment is customized to meet the unique needs and preferences of individual players, and may feature exclusive colors, graphics, and branding. It is crafted by leading manufacturers such as Bauer, CCM, and Warrior, and is designed to meet the highest standards of quality, durability, and performance.  (Human edit is that True, Sherwood, and STX are other brands I have seen on pro stock websites)

So, what are some examples of Pro Stock hockey equipment? Let’s take a look:

Skates: Pro Stock skates are designed to offer unparalleled support, comfort, and performance. They may feature unique graphics and branding and are made from lightweight materials such as carbon fiber. These customized boots allow players to have a perfect fit, which is critical for a sport that requires rapid changes in direction and high-impact movements.

Sticks: Pro Stock sticks are designed to meet the unique needs of individual players. They feature customized curves, flexes, and blade patterns and may be constructed from high-end materials such as carbon fiber. These customized sticks are critical for pro players who rely on their sticks for puck control, shot accuracy, and overall performance.

Gloves: Pro Stock gloves offer a high level of protection, comfort, and mobility. They may feature unique colors, graphics, and branding and are made from lightweight and durable materials. The customization of gloves allows players to have a better grip on their sticks, enabling them to execute their moves with greater precision.

Helmets: Pro Stock helmets offer players a high level of protection and comfort. They may feature unique colors, graphics, and branding and are made from lightweight and durable materials such as carbon fiber. These helmets are critical for professional players who require the best possible protection while maintaining a high level of comfort during gameplay.

Overall, Pro Stock hockey equipment is designed to give professional players a competitive edge on the ice. It offers features and technologies that are not available in standard retail models and is customized to meet the unique needs and preferences of individual players. Whether you are a pro player or an avid fan, understanding the benefits of Pro Stock hockey equipment can give you a greater appreciation for the sport and the equipment used to play it.

Hello, it’s me again (a human).  I chose Pro Stock equipment for a few reasons to write about since I could use both of my interests previously listed in this post.  The section above, written by ChatGPT, focused on the professional player.  I, a human, will write about the vast majority of players, kids and beer league players. The original intended market for pro stock equipment are typically professional and college players.  You will see equipment from the NHL, Minor League teams, Colleges and possible some others.  I have purchased equipment that were sourced to the NHL and colleges pending the information on the website and markings on the equipment. Now for my experience with pro stock equipment.

The first reason I started to look into and research pro stock equipment was cost.  Pro Stock equipment is generally less expensive than the retail counterpart.  I started looking into hockey sticks, which I am using as an example and the same benefits and downsides exist for the other pieces of equipment.  Sticks also happen to be the pieces of equipment that break or wear out the quickest.  With prices now going over $300 per stick on some sticks, it was harder to justify the cost specifically when you want to try out new stick curves.  Not sure about you, but I don’t want to throw away money if a specific curve doesn’t work with my son.  Pro Stock hockey sticks, or team sticks which is a sub type of pro stock equipment are generally $150 to $215 pending the brand and type.  While still expensive, the cost is much more palatable despite a couple downsides.  

One downside of using pro stock equipment is there is no manufacturer’s warranty and if any warranty exists from the website you used to purchase the equipment.  This means that it’s buyer beware where the equipment, in this case a stick, can break the first time one uses it on the ice without the ability to exchange it at a store.  The retail sticks can typically be exchanged if broken within the first 30 days after purchase as a one time only exchange and then you are on the hook if the replacement breaks.  Another downside is the actual number of sticks, and other equipment, that are available to purchase.  This availability is also dependent on the time of year as well.  Just think about it, the College and Professional players have to use the equipment and then at the end of the season will have their extra sticks make it into the pro stock inventory to purchase.  Therefore, you will need to be proactive to purchase once the sticks, which are limited in quantity, become available on the websites.  For example, I purchased 2 Sherwood’s Code TMP Pro hockey stick’s to store until the start of fall travel hockey season and found out a week afterwards that stock is now longer available.  

As mentioned in the last paragraph, I purchased the Sherwood Code TMP Pro hockey sticks.  My son recently changed to a P90TM curve using a CCM stick which was getting pretty beat up since he is a defensemen.  I do monitor the pro stock sites year round and found the Sherwood Code TMP Pro hockey sticks in the PP90TM curve (Sherwood’s code for the curve).  I purchased one for my son to tryout in order to see if the stick worked for him, which it did.  Knowing the limited inventory for pro stock equipment, I ordered two more sticks to hold until the season while my son plays with the original stick.  This also points out to another benefit for the taller players is that pro stock sticks can be found in longer versions over the retail sticks.  Retail sticks typically are 60 inches in length in my area, where as the sticks I purchased were 64 inches in length.   This means I did not have to purchase an extra extension and then glue it to the shorter retail stick.  An interesting information  piece about the original player who ordered the sticks that my son now uses is that the original player will  order sticks to try it out and then decide to not to use them which leads to the sticks availability to purchase.  I think this is the case with the Sherwood sticks I purchased by researching the player’s name on the sticks which I found was associated with a different curve than my son’s sticks that I found on another website and doing a google search.

It is also an interesting thought of where the equipment comes from as well.  I wrote about sticks so far in the post.  The associated teams for the sticks were from the Los Angeles Kings from the NHL, Michigan Tech (College/University), Quinnipiac University, and one university name that I can’t remember at the time of this post.  This also brings up one outlier from pro stock being less expensive which is any custom or little known equipment sizes.  Since my son is tall, I had to find elbow pads that were in the Large size in terms of circumference but longer.  After searching for a while I found a Large sized elbow pads but that contained an extra inch of padding which is atypical for the size.  The caveat here is that the source was from an international league, only one set was available anywhere so it was $100 dollars more due to the scarcity of the supply and where it came from, and it took a month to travel through international logistic companies as well.

I really enjoy researching the equipment and chasing it down which is another benefit of using pro stock, there is a sense of accomplishment to it.  To be successful, prior research knowledge of the form and function of equipment will also help you when purchasing pro stock equipment.

I have listed the three main sites that I have used to purchase equipment below.

Pro Stock Websites I use:

HockeyStickMan.com

ProStockHockey.com

SidelineSwap

Note: I have no affiliation with these websites and receive no monetary value of any kind from these sites.

The information provided in this post was obtained through open research and personal experience using various websites.  The information must be accessible to all in order to appear in this information piece.